Stablecoins are everywhere. But here’s the problem: most of them are tied to the U.S. dollar — and that’s a ticking time bomb, says Concordium CEO Boris Bohr-Bilevitsky.
“If most stablecoins depend on a single fiat currency, any shock to the dollar could destabilize the entire crypto economy.”
Sound dramatic? Maybe. But we already saw it happen with UST. And we’re seeing the cracks form again.
Stablecoins like USDT and USDC serve as the glue between fiat and DeFi. But instead of breaking the system, they’re amplifying U.S. monetary dominance.
Bohr-Bilevitsky isn't alone — even China’s economists are calling for de-dollarization via digital yuan and local stablecoins.
“Stability doesn’t come from market cap,” he says. “It comes from diversity, transparency, and real accountability.”
Let’s talk FUSD — the Justin Sun stablecoin experiment that lost its peg after one market shake. Or worse, Terra’s UST, which had 18.6 billion in market cap before it cratered in days.
These weren’t fringe coins — they were giants. And they still collapsed.
“Trust is fragile. Protocol design matters. Perception matters even more.”
Concordium’s CEO wants to see:
Stablecoins should reflect regional realities, not just mimic Wall Street. This shift isn’t just about ideology — it’s about resilience.
Stablecoins aren’t just about yield farming. They’re the fuel for PayFi — a future of:
“They won’t replace Swift overnight,” says Bohr-Bilevitsky. “But programmable money wins — long term.”
Let’s talk regulation. While other blockchains bolt on compliance (or ignore it), Concordium bakes it in — using zero-knowledge proofs.
This means:
“Privacy and compliance aren’t enemies — if you design for both from day one.”
Forget “too big to fail.” In crypto, it’s too centralized to survive.
Have questions or want to collaborate? Reach us at: info@ath.live