💵 BGUSD vs RWUSD — The Stablecoin Yield Showdown
Bitget’s tokenized U.S. Treasuries take on Binance’s closed-loop credit in the battle for passive-income stable assets.
📊 Numbers That Matter
- BGUSD base APR: 5.0%, paid daily
- RWUSD APR: Up to 4.2%, variable at Binance’s discretion
- Backing:
- BGUSD: Tokenized U.S. Treasury funds (real ownership)
- RWUSD: Internal yield mechanism, no direct ownership
- Integration:
- BGUSD: Loans, futures margin, Launchpool, PoolX
- RWUSD: Binance platform only
🥊 The Core Difference
BGUSD isn’t just a number in your account — it’s a tokenized yield-bearing certificate with actual ownership of U.S. Treasury assets. That means:
- Transparent, auditable reserves
- Composability across DeFi and CeFi
- Multi-purpose utility (collateral, staking, trading margin)
RWUSD, on the other hand, is a Binance-native credit product:
- Yield set internally by Binance
- No user control over the underlying assets
- Locked inside the Binance ecosystem
🔍 Why It Matters Post-FTX
- Transparency wins: BGUSD comes with third-party attestations; RWUSD relies on platform trust.
- Capital efficiency: BGUSD can earn yield and be deployed elsewhere. RWUSD yield stops the moment you move funds.
- User autonomy: BGUSD can leave its home platform; RWUSD is effectively walled in.
🌐 The Bigger Picture
This is more than a yield race — it’s a philosophical split in stablecoin design:
- Open + tokenized = Reserves you can verify, assets you can take anywhere
- Closed + internal = Yield dependent on one platform’s balance sheet and decisions
In a post-FTX world, the market is shifting toward auditable, composable, multi-utility stable assets — and BGUSD fits that bill.
TL;DR
- BGUSD pays more (5% vs 4.2%), with tokenized U.S. Treasury backing and full transparency.
- RWUSD is a yield-bearing internal credit — closed-loop, less flexible, less transparent.
- The fight isn’t just about APR, it’s about control, composability, and trust.