Beijing calls crypto a “systemic threat.” Washington calls it innovation. Two financial superpowers are racing to define the future of money — one block at a time.
At the Financial Street Forum in Beijing, Pan Gongsheng, Governor of the People’s Bank of China, made his stance unmistakable: crypto isn’t innovation — it’s instability.
“Stablecoins are still in their early stages. They fail basic AML and KYC standards, create speculation, and heighten global financial risk.”
While the U.S. rolls out frameworks to institutionalize stablecoins, China is fortifying its 2017 ban — now enforced through financial, cybersecurity, and national-security channels.
Pan’s comments came just as the Ministry of State Security warned against a foreign company accused of collecting biometric data through crypto transactions — a thinly veiled jab at Sam Altman’s Worldcoin.
Though unnamed, the agency tied these activities to potential “national-security threats,” reinforcing Beijing’s fear that decentralized systems could become Trojan horses for data extraction.
Crypto may be outlawed, but China isn’t anti-digital. It’s just anti-anarchy.
The e-CNY, China’s central-bank digital currency (CBDC), has already processed more than ¥14 trillion across over two dozen pilot cities since 2019 — effectively the world’s most advanced digital-currency rollout.
The PBoC is expanding e-CNY integration through:
Translation: Beijing wants to control the tech it bans elsewhere.
Pan also confirmed that the PBoC will resume secondary-market bond trading, previously halted amid liquidity concerns — a subtle move to rebuild China’s yield curve and maintain monetary flexibility.
“We will uphold a supportive stance and a moderately loose policy to sustain recovery,” Pan said.
Meanwhile, Zhu Hexin, head of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, unveiled nine new trade measures to encourage cross-border financial innovation — a possible prelude to international e-CNY trials.
Across the Pacific, the GENIUS Act — signed under Trump — is turning stablecoins into a weapon of soft power.
By providing a clear legal framework for dollar-backed stablecoin issuance, the U.S. is exporting financial infrastructure the same way it once exported software.
What Beijing calls a “risk,” Washington calls monetary diplomacy.
Stablecoins, in the American model, aren’t just digital cash — they’re the next layer of dollar dominance.
| Beijing | Washington |
|---|---|
| 🔒 Bans crypto, promotes e-CNY under state control | 💵 Legalizes and standardizes stablecoins |
| 🧠 Sees decentralization as a sovereignty threat | 🧩 Treats decentralization as a market opportunity |
| 🛰️ Focuses on surveillance and compliance | 🚀 Focuses on liquidity and innovation |
For China, stability means control. For the U.S., control means liquidity.
Each is building a new financial order — one closed, one composable.
This is no longer a debate about Bitcoin. It’s a currency cold war — fought through policy, code, and ideology.
As Thailand, Singapore, and other Asian nations experiment in between these extremes, the global South becomes the testing ground for which model wins: state-controlled trust or open-source liquidity.
Have questions or want to collaborate? Reach us at: [email protected]