Berlin’s latest crypto flashpoint: Should Bitcoin be treated like digital gold instead of a taxable, overregulated investment? The debate pits financial sovereignty against bureaucratic oversight — and the outcome could redefine Europe’s crypto map.
Germany has long been Europe’s crypto policy lab — the first to issue MiCA licenses, the first to tax crypto gains, and now, potentially, the first to reclassify Bitcoin as national strategy.
The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has filed a parliamentary motion urging that Bitcoin be recognized as “free, digital money” — distinct from altcoins, stablecoins, or securities under the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework.
Their argument: Bitcoin’s core design — decentralized, finite, censorship-resistant — aligns it more with gold than with fintech speculation. Overregulation, they warn, risks pushing Germany’s growing crypto economy offshore.
“Bitcoin represents financial sovereignty for individuals,” said Bundestag member Joana Cotar. “It protects against inflation and government overreach. Germany should treat BTC as a strategic reserve asset rather than selling it prematurely.”
AfD’s proposal gained traction after Germany’s controversial decision to sell nearly 50,000 seized BTC in 2024 — worth $2.9B then, over $6B today. The sale — intended as a liquidation of criminal proceeds — has since become political ammunition for those arguing that Bitcoin should be held, not dumped.
It’s not just about profit. For many in Berlin’s crypto policy circles, it’s about sovereignty — retaining exposure to a global, non-state monetary network amid rising geopolitical uncertainty.
At the heart of the debate lies the MiCA dilemma: Europe’s first unified crypto law promises regulatory clarity but risks strangling innovation through heavy compliance.
The AfD motion seeks to:
Germany’s regulator BaFin currently enforces MiCA rules across exchanges, custodians, and stablecoin issuers. But the AfD argues that Bitcoin — by design — should remain outside this scope, serving as a sovereign hedge rather than a regulated product.
Germany’s internal debate mirrors one emerging across Europe. In France, lawmakers have pushed for a national Bitcoin reserve and euro-denominated stablecoins while opposing the ECB’s digital euro — calling it a threat to privacy and monetary independence.
By contrast, Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel defends the digital euro, warning that without a central digital currency, Europe risks dependence on U.S. or Chinese payment networks.
In short: France wants to compete with stablecoins. Germany’s conservatives want to opt out. Brussels wants to control the narrative.
Germany’s next crypto pivot could define Europe’s digital asset future.
If Berlin moves to exempt Bitcoin from MiCA oversight, it could become the EU’s premier innovation hub — attracting capital, miners, and institutional players fleeing overregulation.
Deutsche Bank’s planned crypto custody service (launching in 2026) already hints at that trajectory. With Gen Z and millennial investors dominating the market, domestic demand is surging — even as policymakers argue over ideology.
The bigger picture: Bitcoin’s status isn’t just a financial question anymore. It’s about who controls the future of money — the state, the market, or the code.
Have questions or want to collaborate? Reach us at: [email protected]