Elon Musk’s X has officially launched its Handle Marketplace — letting Premium subscribers claim inactive usernames for a fee. The move turns digital identity into digital property, opening a new revenue stream while sparking debate over ownership, access, and what a name is worth in the age of platform capitalism.
For years, X (formerly Twitter) has been clogged with inactive accounts and dormant usernames — a graveyard of half-forgotten handles.
Now, they’re up for sale.
Through the new Handle Marketplace, Premium-tier users can search, request, and buy unused usernames, gaining early access to what Musk’s team calls a “redistribution of identity.”
“The X Handle Marketplace is our industry-first solution to redistribute handles that are no longer in use,” the official @XHandles account posted.
The idea? Turn idle handles into scarce digital assets, much like domain names — but personal.
Handles, once a free expression of individuality, are now tokens of status and purchasing power.
By placing usernames behind a paywall, X has monetized identity itself — transforming what used to be self-assigned into something earned or bought.
Critics see it as another layer of digital inequality: paying users get first claim to desirable names, while the rest watch from behind the glass.
“We’re witnessing the domain-ification of identity,” says Tasha Nguyen, a media researcher. “Usernames used to express individuality. Now they express purchasing power.”
It’s not hard to imagine a secondary market emerging — a resale economy of verified handles trading for real money, complete with price speculation, brokers, and scarcity premiums.
The Handle Marketplace fits neatly into Elon Musk’s monetization stack — verification, Premium subscriptions, creator payouts, and now usernames.
To Musk, idle usernames are “unrealized revenue.”
Analysts estimate that if just 1% of Premium users purchase new handles, the program could generate tens of millions in quarterly revenue — and far more as marketplace trading evolves.
But it’s not just about money. It’s about building the financialized super-app Musk has long envisioned, where every action — from posting to naming — carries transactional value.
Not everyone is buying the hype.
Digital rights advocates say the move commodifies identity in ways that blur the line between social belonging and market access.
“Your online name shouldn’t be for sale,” wrote Privacy International in a response thread. “It’s a social construct, not a speculative market.”
If a username is no longer a personal claim but a tradable good, who owns digital identity — the user, or the platform?
The question cuts to the core of how Web 2.5 capitalism monetizes presence itself.
As X locks naming rights behind paywalls, Web3 alternatives like Nostr, Farcaster, and ENS (Ethereum Name Service) are quietly gaining momentum.
Unlike centralized systems, these protocols tie usernames to wallets, not corporations — meaning you can actually own your name across apps, forever.
In a world where your handle could depend on your subscription status, self-sovereign identity may soon be the only true form of digital ownership left.
“In the race between platforms and protocols,” one analyst noted, “digital identity is the new real estate — and X just opened the bidding.”
By 2026, expect to see:
What used to be a @name is now a digital deed. The age of platform capitalism has officially extended to your identity.
Have questions or want to collaborate? Reach us at: [email protected]